Sunday, May 31, 2009

The Mexican

After not seeing this movie for a long time due to the presence of Julia Roberts as well as an unappealing title, I finally gave it a shot.
The cast was what you might call "semi-star-studded"... of recognizable faces, mostly "B-list" actors, but recognizable nonetheless. Although Pitt, Roberts, and Gandolfini all give good performances, the real standout in this movie is the soundtrack. The soundtrack perfectly matches the mood and atmosphere of the story, making the story (which was pretty shallow and poorly thought-out) itself all the more enjoyable.

7/10

Tuesday, May 26, 2009

In the Electric Mist

Let me start out by saying: I'm not a huge fan of movies about the South. I'm not a huge fan of Tommy Lee Jones (who plays approximately 2-3 characters across ALL his movies). In the Electric Mist, however, was a good movie. A bit off-beat for a Tommy Lee Jones (who I lost a lot of faith in after the terrible movie The Three Burials of Melquiades Estrada) movie, this movie held my interest the entire way through, even though half the time I wasn't really sure why.

This movie also has a great (albeit somewhat predictable) supporting performance from John Goodman.

7/10

Saturday, May 23, 2009

The Machinist

Yet another Christian Bale movie.  Easily one of Bale's best performances. Great writing and a non-linear format make for an intriguing watch. Oh yeah, and Bale lost 60+ pounds to play the role. Yikes.

Highly recommended.

9/10

Friday, May 22, 2009

The Prestige

This is another movie that I've seen previously, that I decided to watch again. I've been on something of a Christian Bale kick lately.

This movie is an excellent flick about a rivalry between two magicians, one a great showman but only mediocre magician (Hugh Jackman), and the other a great magician but mediocre showman (Christian Bale). After Borden (Bale) accidently kills Angier's (Jackman) wife, Angier becomes obsessed with finding out the secret to Borden's greatest trick, with the ultimate goal of destroying Borden's career and life.

With a great script and outstanding performances from Bale, Jackman, and Michael Caine, this movie is definitely worth watching if you haven't already. And if you have already seen it once, it's worth watching a second time for all the extra things you'll notice the second time around.

9/10

Monday, May 11, 2009

American Psycho

Having seen this movie once previously (a few years ago), I wanted to see it again because I couldn't remember much about it. So, this is the first movie review here at moviepostsonly that covers a movie that I am not seeing for the first time.

American Psycho is, to be sure, a very odd movie. Following narcissist and misogynist Wall Street executive Patrick Bateman (Christian Bale) through his odd world of insanity, sex, murder, and music, we see a man struggling to be seen as the definitive "man" by the outside world, while clearly only partially even knowing what it is to be human. Bale's performance is absolutely outstanding, and the movie is so full of quotable lines and memorable scenes that I'll probably thinking about it for a while to come.

Finally, the movie packs the full punch of awesomeness with a surprise ending that leaves the viewer not completely sure of what they have just seen on the screen.

8/10

Sunday, May 10, 2009

Resident Evil: Degeneration

So I got around to watching the "fourth" Resident Evil movie, the computer-animated one. I'm really happy that I saw this separately from the other three, because, although definitely a "Resident Evil" movie, it is undoubtedly NOT a "part" of the original three. As a standalone movie, it's not bad. Some of the graphics are absolutely amazing. But to put it simply: I just don't like this style of movie/animation. I feel like I'm watching one of those "between levels" bits of film in a video game. Considering this film was made by Capcom, I guess I basically am. Apparently this movie was made to please fans of the video game (unlike the previous three movies) so maybe that was why I didn't completely "get" it.

6/10

Saturday, May 9, 2009

Resident Evil Trilogy

Hearing that Resident Evil was actually a decent movie, especially considered it's based on a video game, I decided (having never seen any of the movies) to watch the entire collection last night. I ended up watching 3/4 of the movies (the fourth was a direct-to-video animated movie). I will watch and review that one later, but as far as I'm concerned (having watched the three live-action movies that actually were in theatres) I have seen the entire "trilogy."

So, we'll start with the first, Resident Evil. The idea: a deadly virus (the "t-virus") created by the evil Umbrella Corporation has spread through their underground lab. A "special ops" team from the Corporation is sent down to investigate what happened, only to be greeted by virus-infected individuals who act like zombies in that they move slowly, try to eat 
you, and (in at least one case) walk on broken sideways feet. One member of the team is Alice (Milla Jovovich), is a complete badass who only wears Certified Sexy clothing. Remember, this movie is based on a video game. In the video game, Alice is the main character, so she must wear much less clothing than one normally would in a combat situation. And in the case of this movie, I didn't mind at all. Milla Jovovich was surprisingly attractive (I remember thinking she didn't look particularly good on the cover of the movie) and seeing her the entire movie certainly added an element of enjoyability to it.

Although the plot was pretty shallow, and the idea (virus-made zombies) was done better and much scarier in 28 Days Later, this actually was a fun movie to watch. Character development (especially of Jovovich's character) was surprisingly high for a movie of this type. The movie also never dragged. By the time it was over, I was actually left wanting more. Luckily for me, there were still two more movies to watch.

The second movie, Resident Evil: Apocalypse, I approached with caution. I had heard from various sources that this was the worst of the series, and very definitely NOT a good movie. Luckily, it wasn't nearly as bad as I was expecting. The basic idea of the movie is that the t-virus has now spread outside the underground facility and infected the entire city. The city has been quarantined, and (naturally) Alice (still Milla Jovovich) is inside. This movie follows much the same pattern as the first movie: people must survive hordes of infected zombies, and Alice must kick major ass. In this film, due to viral modifications inflicted upon Alice by the Umbrella Corporation, she is an even bigger badass than she was in the previous film. However, this time she seems more appropriately dressed for combat. Luckily, this does not at all take away from her attractiveness, and just watching Jovovich continues to be an enjoyable element of the movie.

Again, a fun movie to watch, although not scary and not quite as good as the first. Also, unlike the timid, only-eventually-asskicking Alice of the first movie, Alice (in this movie genetically altered and already used to killing zombies) plays the hardened badass role. And it works well. BONUS fact: one of the soldiers stuck in the city is played by Zack Ward, aka bully Scut Farkus of A Christmas Story.

The third and final movie, Resident Evil: Extinction, takes place in a world that has been devoured by the virus. Only a few uninfected nomads remain. And who is one of those nomads? Alice (still Milla Jovovich). Alice has now developed even MORE powers, and now, in addition to her extreme zombie-fighting skills, also has some telekinetic abilities. The desert-like atmosphere of the U.S. makes for a cool backdrop for the action. One of the highlights is seeing Las Vegas buried under sand.

Of the three movies, Extinction was the second best, but really all three movies were almost identical in quality.

This is a trilogy in which the whole is greater than the sum of its parts: watching the trilogy as a whole makes for a better experience than watching them individually would. It's like watching a 3-part, 4.5 hour movie. Each movie flows well into the next, and plot points remain more-or-less consistent between the three (this frequently doesn't occur in movie series). Also impressive was the fact that they managed to bring back the same actors (the ones playing characters that were still alive by the end of the film) in all three movies. Also sort of nice was the fact that all three were written by the same person (Paul W.S. Anderson) but each was directed by a different person. I think this helped prevent each movie from seeming exactly the same as the last.

This would be a great trilogy to watch as a "party" with friends because the movies move quickly, all three take less than 5 hours to get through (unlike, say, a Lord of the Rings trilogy party), and they're good "popcorn" movies.

Resident Evil:
7/10

Resident Evil: Apocalypse
6.5/10

Resident Evil: Extinction
7/10

Resident Evil Trilogy
8/10

Friday, May 8, 2009

Star Trek (2009)



Star Trek was a film that you couldn't help BUT enjoy from start to finish. The story, acting, effects, score, and general excitement were all well above average for action and sci-fi flicks. But most importantly of all: it felt like Star Trek. The essence of Trek was kept intact and it pervaded the entire film, while not trying too hard to be "Trekkish."

Those cast members whose roles were tantamount to mocking their previous counterparts like Scotty and Chekov were commendable. McCoy was amazing. But then Spock, Kirk, and Uhura while staying true to the spirit of the original characters became unique in this film, and due to the modified timeline, it's okay. In fact, the modified timeline makes everything okay. Nevermind the fact that the film doesn't ever explain how one event seemingly changed the fabric of history. Everyone KNOWS that once you mess with the timeline, then history is changed, and that's that. No additional explanation necessary. So the fact that the Federation hadn't encountered Romulans yet in the original Trek but they have in the film? Timeline changed. The fact that Scotty helped develop transporters and warp technology but both already existed in the film? Timeline changed. Yet, despite this overly convenient plot device, you WANT this universe to be different. There's no way to ape/mimic the original, and even if you could, who would want to?

Yes I'm rambling in no logical order about acting, plot, ect. but that's just it! This Trek film was full of illogical details compared to the history you know about original Trek, but everything is supposed to be new. Spock showing more emotion? That's okay, and there's a good explanation for that. Kirk becoming captain earlier than he had before? There's an explanation for that.

I really didn't think such a modern, spiffy, shiny-looking film could do justice to the original films and universe in any way, but somehow they did. The references and nods to the fans of "true" Star Trek are present and most feel natural and if you're a fan, they warm your heart. The musical score, while a pounding dramatic soundtrack, includes the occasional audio cue that a classic fan will pick up on. In the opening scene of the movie, we get the classic red alert alarm and classic communicators. The classic high-pitched whirring of a ship buzzing past the camera in space is there.

Now, this film truly proved itself when treading upon the most dangerous waters of all: explaining Star Trek history. What happened to young Kirk and young Spock? How did Kirk pass the Kobayashi Maru scenario? How did Dr. McCoy get his nickname? Uhura's first name? How did Pike end up in that wheelchair/scooter?

And again, if you don't like how they tried to explain events in Star Trek cannon, that's okay, because it's all part of the alternate timeline. The alternate timeline began on the day of Kirk's birth, so every event from that moment on can be explained with that plot device. If a fan or a writer of the film so chooses to reject any fact or reference from either "classic" Trek lore or the new film, this explanation works for both!

Eric Bana as the villain Nero was on a path for vengeance the entire film, so he was a pretty one dimensional character. But Kirk and Spock have something to prove to themselves and their legacies, and they carry the film. We see the beginnings of their relationship, and the roots of the dichotamy of the logical Vulcan and headstrong, brazen young Kirk and how in the end they mesh as friends.

Leonard Nimoy's scenes also work well and he seriously does not act as old as he truly is. The elder Spock's influence on the younger Spock is... well, he has a significant influence upon young Spock and offers some key advice which helps you better understand younger Spock, and allows Quinto to make the character his own in future sequels.

The film was fun. It was even exciting, and it was just plain satisfying above all else. I was smiling nearly the entire film. It never lagged. It was a simple revenge story with non-stop action, and that pacing and the constant series of problems allowed the film to be more about the characters solving the problems and interacting with each other than merely focusing on the action, and it was perfect. Each crew member has moments to shine, and there were zero let-downs.

Were there any issues? Well, Chekov's accent seemed to fluctuate between being true to the original and then other times sounding like me doing my best "In Soviet Russia..." joke. The elder/past Spock's final scenes and the way the writers handle him at the very end makes little to no sense. Some of the science behind the science fiction seemed too make zero sense (red matter? fine, use red matter, but at least explain the THEORY of red matter!) And finally, the worst thing about the new film? The Enterprise doesn't feel like the Enterprise. It never became a character in and of itself. The new look and feel to it was excusable because the entire film had a new look and feel, while still feeling like Star Trek. But we don't get to explore the bridge, engineering, or the transporter room in any meaningful ways. Sulu still has a lever for the warp controls, and Uhura has her classic earpiece, but that was it. While the exterior design of the Enterprise was cool, the CGI Enterprise's exterior (in addition to the other starships) was a bit too glossy, and therefore slightly fake. It is ironic then to think of the fact that the Original Series and The Next Generation, by using a plastic model, made their ships appear more "real" than in this new 21st century film.

While the TV ads are correct that this wasn't my father's Star Trek, for the most part, the universe felt like Trek, and my father's Star Trek had died a while ago. And while any attempt to resurrect the corpse of my father's Star Trek could have led to the creation of a mutant-zombie aberration that felt as if it were raping your childhood, Star Trek seems to have found a way to rise from the ashes. The true test of the new universe will be how they handle the inevitable sequel which must go beyond establishing the characters, but truly building characters and using the entire spectrum of the Star Trek universe from which to adapt an epic story. But for now, I loved it and I want more.

8/10

Tuesday, May 5, 2009

Review: Truncated

Two recent movies that I attempted to watch I had to cut short because they were so terrible. In each, I got approximately 30 minutes in (which if you have tried to watch these movies, you will know that that in itself is a feat) and then had to give up due to their extremely poor quality.

The Spirit was the first that I gave up on. Horrible dialogue, extremely over-stylized everything... there's a reason that movies that are made from comic books usually try to give the viewer a glimpse of the fact that it is from a comic book (giving the movie that "comic book" feel) but still very much maintain that "this is a movie, not a comic book."  The Spirit makes the mistake of taking the whole "this is a comic book" thing TOO far, and thereby boring the viewer with stale dialogue, over-the-top (and not in a good way) performances, and visual effects enough to make the viewer say, "ENOUGH ALREADY!"

The other horrible movie that I only got 30 minutes into was Postal. I should have known that any Uwe Boll movie would be a 100% sheer unadulterated suck-fest.

Saturday, May 2, 2009

A Mighty Wind

Another mockumentary from Christopher Guest, A Mighty Wind fell just short of my expectations after having seen, This is Spinal Tap, Waiting for Guffman, and Best in Show.  Don't get me wrong: it was good, it was (in Guest's formulaic style) funny. But... it seemed to somehow "miss" in capturing the exact persona of that niche of people that the movie focused on (folk singers). In it's own right, this was a decent movie, but as a Guest mockumentary, it was the worst I've seen yet.

6/10